EU’s New Carry-On Baggage Rule: Why It Was Created and Why IATA Opposes It
EU’s New Carry-On Baggage Rule: Why It Was Created — and Why IATA Opposes It
The European Union’s latest air travel reform has ignited a continent-wide debate: should all passengers have the right to bring carry-on baggage for free? While the EU Parliament has proposed a rule to ban fees for standard cabin bags, the aviation industry led by IATA is pushing back hard.

EU Carry-On Baggage Policy Change
What Is the EU Proposing?
The European
Parliament’s Transport Committee recently approved a proposal requiring
airlines to allow:
- One standard cabin bag (up to 7 kg, total dimensions
≤ 100 cm), and
- One personal item (up to 40×30×15 cm),
free of charge on all EU flights.
The move
aims to clarify and enforce a 2014 European Court of Justice (ECJ)
decision that deemed fees for reasonable cabin baggage unfair. The full
Parliament and the EU Council must still vote on it before it becomes
law—likely in late 2025 or 2026.
Why Was This Rule Introduced?
🔹 To End Hidden Fees
Many
low-cost airlines offer cheap base fares but charge extra for even small
carry-on bags. This often misleads consumers and inflates the actual price of
flying.
🔹 To Create Uniform Standards
Each
airline has different baggage policies—creating confusion, inconvenience, and
potential penalties for travelers. The EU wants to harmonize rules across the
bloc.
🔹 To Respond to Enforcement Gaps
Despite the
2014 ECJ ruling, airlines have continued charging for carry-ons—prompting
national fines (e.g. Spain’s recent €179 million in penalties to Ryanair,
easyJet, and others).
The International
Air Transport Association (IATA), which represents most of the world’s
major airlines, has openly criticized the proposed rule. Its Director
General Willie Walsh called the plan "an overreach that risks
damaging consumer choice and airline business models."
IATA’s Key Objections:
|
Concern |
Explanation |
|
Higher base fares |
Mandatory
inclusion of baggage means all passengers—even those traveling light—will pay
more. |
|
Operational issues |
Uniform
free carry-ons could cause overhead-bin crowding, boarding delays, and slower
turnarounds. |
|
Loss of pricing flexibility |
Airlines
use unbundled fares to offer cheaper tickets; the rule would interfere with
this model. |
|
Legal overstep |
IATA
argues the rule may violate existing EU laws that protect airlines’
commercial freedom. |
Rather than
imposing mandatory baggage allowances, IATA has suggested the following:
1. Enhanced
Transparency Standards
- Airlines should clearly display
total price comparisons, including all fees, before booking.
- Digital booking platforms
should provide easy side-by-side comparisons.
2. Self-Regulation
with Guidelines
- Let airlines set baggage
policies freely but require clearer communication.
- Create a standard “baggage
disclosure format” to avoid confusion.
3. Focus
on Enforcement, Not New Rules
- Instead of passing new laws, enforce
the 2014 ECJ ruling more consistently.
- Penalize deceptive practices on
a national level, rather than a blanket EU-wide rule.
Some
airlines are quietly adapting, despite IATA’s objections:
- Ryanair: Increased its free personal
bag size to 40×30×20 cm.
- Wizz Air: Already offers free bags
within the proposed limits.
- easyJet: Still charges for cabin bags
and rewards staff for catching oversized bags.
If the rule
becomes law, airlines may be forced to restructure fares and some may
pass the cost back to travelers through higher ticket prices.
What It
Means for Aviation Professionals
Whether
you're working in ground operations, cabin crew, regulatory compliance, or
customer service, this rule will change workflows and passenger
expectations.
JobsReach Aviation the platform for aviation professionals helps keep
staff, airlines, and stakeholders up to date with industry regulations,
operational trends, and career opportunities shaped by policy changes like this
one.
While the
EU sees the carry-on rule as a way to protect passengers and enforce
fairness, IATA views it as a threat to airline innovation, choice, and
affordability. The outcome of this debate will not only shape the flying
experience in Europe it could influence global aviation policy.
As both
sides gear up for legal and political battles, one thing is clear: the future
of cabin baggage is no longer just a travel convenience it's a flashpoint in a
much larger fight over the future of air travel.
Comments
Post a Comment